Nyoto Suseno(1*),

(1) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
(*) Corresponding Author


The research of any where founded majority students have common difficulties in abstract physics concept. The result of observation, lecturers have problem  in teaching implementation of abstract concepts on physics learning. The objective of this research is to find out the ways how to overcome this problem. The research place of  physics education programs and senior high school. The data are colected by quetionere, observation and interview. The lecturer behavior to making out this case is use of analogy to make concrete a abstract concept. This action is true, because the analogies are dynamic tools that facilitate understanding, rather than representations of the correct and static explanations. Using analogies not only promoted profound understanding of abstract concept, but also helped students overcome their misconceptions. However used analogy in teaching not yet planed with seriousness, analogy used spontanously with the result that less optimal. By planing and selecting right analogy, the role of analogy can be achieved the optimal result. Therefore, it is important to maping analogies of abstract consepts on physics learning.

Full Text:



Boersma K. et al. (2005). Research and The Quality of Science Education. Netherlands: Springer.

Chiu, M. H. dan Lin, L. W. (2005). “Promoting Fourth Graders' Conceptual Change of Their Understanding of Electric Current via Multiple Analogies”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 42, (4), 429 - 464.

Degeng, l. Ny. S. 1989. Ilmu Pengajaran Taksonomi Variabel. Jakarta: P2LPTK Depdikbud.

Diut (1989). “Teachers Use of Analogies in Their Regular Teaching Routines”. Journal of Research in Science Education. 19, 291-299.

Duit. R. 1991. “On the Role of Analogies and Metaphors in Learning Science”. Science Education. 75, (6), 649 – 672.

Gentner, D. 1983. “Structure-Mapping: A Theoritical Framework for Analogy”. Cognitive Science. 7, 155 – 170.

Glynn et al. 1989. Analogical Reasoning and Problem Solving in The Textbooks. New York: Plenum.

Lawson, A.E. (1993). “The Importance of Analogy: A Prelude to the Special Issue”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30, (10), 1213 – 1214.

Oliva, J. M. (2005). “What Professional Knowledge Should we as Physics Teachers have about The Use of Analogies?”. Journal Physics Teacher Education. 3, (1), 11 – 16.

Podolefsky, N. S. and Finkelstein, N. D. (2006). “Use of Analogy in Learning Physics: The Role of Representation”. Physics Review Special Topics, Physics Education Research. 2, (020101), 1 – 10.

Susenon, N. & Setiawan, A. 2012. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Menggunakan Analogi pada Konsep Rangkaian Listrik Seri dan Paralel. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (JPP). 19, (2), 205 – 212.

Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Pembelajaran Menggunakan Analogi dalam Perkuliahan Listrik-Magnet. Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Sains di Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta pada tanggal 8 Mei 2010.

Webb, M. J. (1985). “Analogies and Their Limitations”. Journal of School Science and Mathematics. 85, (8), 645 – 650.

Wong, E.D. (1993). “Understanding the Generative Capacity of Analogies as a Tool for Explanation”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30, 1273 – 1290.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Indexing by:







 View JPF Stats


 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika by Physics Education Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



Flag Counter