THE COMPARISON OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN RECOUNT TEXT INSTRUCTION BETWEEN USING STAD AND JIGSAW TECHNIQUE AT DIFFERENT READING FREQUENCY AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMA N 1 RUMBIA ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013

Didik Firnadi(1*),

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
(*) Corresponding Author


Abstract


Reading as one of the four skills has always been as a part of the syllabus in English instruction. Based on the Pra survey, reading comprehension of the students of the first grade of SMA N 1 Rumbia is still low, most of them still lack structure knowledge and vocabulary, and their reading frequency in reading is still low. There are two techniques presented as a solution in this research. They are STAD Technique and Jigsaw technique. The objective of this research is to find out the difference result of using STAD and Jigsaw technique toward students’ reading comprehension in recount text at different high and low reading frequency and to find out there is significant interaction and comparison of reading comprehension in recount text, learning technique, and different reading frequency at the first grade students of SMA N 1 Rumbia academic year 2012/2013.

The method of investigation is held through quantitative research. The researcher uses true experimental research. In this experiment, the the researcher applies factorials design. The research is conducted at the first grade of SMA N 1 Rumbia in academic year 2012/2013. The population in this research is 180 students. It consisted 6 classes and each class consist 30 students. The researcher takes 52 students from total population as the sample, 26 students as experiment class and 26 as control class that match based on classification of student level. The researcher uses cluster random sampling as technique sampling.

To analyze data, the researcher uses ANOVA TWO WAYS formula. The researcher got the result of Fhit is 18, 2 and Ftable  is 7, 14. It means that Fhit > Ftable. And the criterion of Ftest is Ha accepted if Fhit  > Ftable. So, there is any difference result of students’ Reading comprehension in recount text using STAD and Jigsaw, and STAD technique is more effective technique than Jigsaw technique toward students Reading comprehension at different reading frequency at the first grade of SMA N 1 Rumbia academic year 2012/2013. The researcher expects English teacher use STAD Technique in reading instruction especially in recount text, so the students feel fun and enjoy in following the learning process.


Keywords


Jigsaw, Reading Comprehension, Reading Frequency, Recount, STAD

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad Jazim. (2010). Statistik Lanjutan. Metro: Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1996). Prosedur Penelitian: suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta

Artz, A. F., & Newman, C. M. (1990). Cooperative learning. Mathematics Teacher, 83, 448-449.

Brophy, Jere (1998). Motivating Students to Learn. State University: Michigan.

Brown, H Douglas (2001). Teaching by Principles. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc: San Francisco.

Brown H. Douglas. (2000). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. California: San Francisco State University.

David C. McClelland, et.al (1976). The Achievement Motive; New York: irvington.

Elliot, Et al (2000). Educational Psychology: Effective Teaching, Effective Learning. McGraw­Hill Companies Inc: USA.

Harmer, Jeremy. (1985). The Practice of English Language Testing

_______. (2002). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

_______. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: Bina Aksara

Retrieved wikipedia 2008

Hornby.AS. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

Irianto, Agus (2004). Stastitik: Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Kencana: Jakarta.

Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative and individualistic learning. (3 rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Karwono,(1991). Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Teori dan Penelitian: IKIP Malang.

Karwono, Heni Mularsih. (2010). Belajar dan Pembelajaran serta Pemanfaatan Sumber Belajar. Jakarta: Cerdas Jaya

Kessler, C (1992). Cooperative language learning: A teacher resource book. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. M.A. Dissertation, Mahidol University.

Koindrasari, Etri. (2012). The Comparison of Jigsaw and STAD Cooperative Technique toward Simple Present Tense Mastery at the Eight Level in SMP N 3 Batanghari Nuban Academic Year 2011/2012. Published University of Muhammadiyah Metro. Metro

Metzke, L., & Berghoff, P. (1999). Cooperative learning in the classroom. In A. S. Canter & S. A. Carroll (Eds.), Helping children at home and school: Handouts from your school psychologist (pp. 147-150). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

M. Richard and Porter, W. lyman (1991). Motivation and work Behavior. Mc Graw­Hill Book: Singapure.

Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classrooms. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Nunan, David1 (1991). Language Teaching Methodology. New York: Prentice hall.

Nuttall, Christine (1996). Teaching Reading Skills: in a Foreign Language. Reed Educational and Professional Publishing: Jordan Hill.

Patel.M.F, et.al (2008). English language Teaching(methods, tools & techniques). Vaishali Nagar: Jaipur.

Prasetyo, Eko. (2012). The Comparison between Reading Ability in Narrative Text Using STAD and CBI Methods at the Tenth Level at the Senior High School Muhammadiyah 1 Metro 2011/2012. Published University of Muhammadiyah Metro. Metro

Retrived from http://www.allaboutlearningpress.com/motivation-to-read, accessed on tuesday, 5th February, 2013

Retrived from http://pustakabakul.blogspot.com/2012/02/essence-of-reading.html

Stahl, S.A (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221-234.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Slavin, E. Robert (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Needham Heights Steers: Massachusetts.

Uno, B Hamzah. (2007). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Analisis dibidang pendidikan. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/pj.v2i1.719

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Didik Firnadi -



=====================

Publisher

Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Unit Publikasi Ilmiah ( Scientific Publication Unit)

Address:

Gedung HI Lt 1, Ruang UPT Publikasi Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara No.116, Iringmulyo, Metro Timur, Kota Metro, Lampung 34111
Phone/WA: +6285709141060

Email:upi@ummetro.ac.id 

======================

e-ISSN-2442-482x  p-ISSN-2089-3355

Download Premise Official Template  June -October 2022

Certificate